Shared Governance › Demographic Analysis
* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
|
Your results compared to PEERS ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ► |
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED |
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
mean |
overall |
tenured |
pre-ten |
ntt |
full |
assoc |
men |
women |
white |
foc |
asian |
urm |
ten vs pre-ten |
ten vs ntt |
full vs assoc |
men vs women |
white vs foc |
white vs asian |
white vs urm |
2015 |
|||||||
Governance: Trust |
3.66
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
I understand how to voice opinions about policies |
3.75
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration |
3.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
|
white
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement |
3.99
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication |
3.40
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith |
3.76
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose |
3.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
+
|
||||||
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus |
3.25
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
+
|
||||||
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input |
3.40
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view |
3.81
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility |
4.03
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand |
3.42
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input |
3.52
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions |
3.50
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
|
asian
|
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions |
3.23
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
+
|
||||||
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together |
3.60
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
+
|
||||||
Governance: Adaptability |
3.03
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
|
|
+
|
||||||
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances |
3.21
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance |
2.68
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
|
+
|
||||||
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders |
3.20
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Governance: Productivity |
3.43
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
||||||
Overall effectiveness of shared governance |
3.46
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
|
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
My committees make measureable progress towards goals |
3.62
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Public recognition of progress |
3.25
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
+
|
||||||
