Nature of Work › Demographic Analysis
* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
Your results compared to PEERS ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ► |
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED |
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
mean |
overall |
tenured |
pre-ten |
ntt |
full |
assoc |
men |
women |
white |
foc |
asian |
urm |
ten vs pre-ten |
ten vs ntt |
full vs assoc |
men vs women |
white vs foc |
white vs asian |
white vs urm |
2015 |
|||||||
Nature of Work: Research |
3.65
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Time spent on research |
2.95
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Expectations for finding external funding |
3.71
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Influence over focus of research |
4.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Quality of grad students to support research |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for research |
3.94
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Support for engaging undergrads in research |
4.04
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Support for obtaining grants (pre-award) |
3.19
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Support for maintaining grants (post-award) |
3.54
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Support for securing grad student assistance |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for travel to present/conduct research |
4.25
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Availability of course release for research |
2.40
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
|
-
|
||||||
Nature of Work: Service |
3.25
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Time spent on service |
3.14
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Support for faculty in leadership roles |
2.89
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Number of committees |
3.42
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Attractiveness of committees |
3.60
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Discretion to choose committees |
3.57
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Equitability of committee assignments |
2.78
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Number of student advisees |
3.58
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Support for being a good advisor |
3.33
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Equity of the distribution of advising responsibilities |
3.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Nature of Work: Teaching |
4.02
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Time spent on teaching |
3.93
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
white
|
-
|
||||||
Number of courses taught |
3.35
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Level of courses taught |
4.26
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
white
|
|
||||||
Discretion over course content |
4.65
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Number of students in classes taught |
3.94
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
men
|
|
|
white
|
|
||||||
Quality of students taught |
4.52
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
full
|
men
|
foc
|
|
urm
|
+
|
||||||
Equitability of distribution of teaching load |
3.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
|
||||||
Quality of grad students to support teaching |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
Teaching schedule |
4.21
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
asian
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for teaching diverse learning styles |
3.67
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
foc
|
|
urm
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for assessing student learning |
3.90
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for developing online/hybrid courses |
3.46
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
N<5
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
white
|
N<5
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
||||||
Support for teaching online/hybrid courses |
3.41
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
N<5
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
women
|
|
N<5
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
||||||
Related Survey Items |
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Time spent on outreach |
3.43
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Time spent on administrative tasks |
2.82
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
|
white
|
|
||||||
Ability to balance teaching/research/service |
2.87
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|